• Part of
    Ubiquity Network logo
    Join Mailing List Publish with us

    Read Chapter
  • No readable formats available
  • Why is participation inequality important?

    Mordechai (Muki) Haklay

    Chapter from the book: Capineri, C et al. 2016. European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information.

     Download

    Participation inequality – the phenomenon that a very small percentage of participants contribute a very significant proportion of information to the total output – is persistent across Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) and citizen science projects. It has been identified in both online and offline projects that rely on volunteers’ effort over the past 20 years and, therefore, can be expected to appear in new projects. This chapter looks at participation inequality (also known as the 1% rule or the 90-9-1 rule), its origins and some of its characteristics. The chapter also explains how participation inequality emerges in a project at both temporal and spatial scales, and also evaluates its implication on the use of VGI and citizen science data. The chapter suggests a generic rule for analysts of VGI and citizen science datasets, in the form: ‘When using and analysing crowdsourced information, consider the implications of participation inequality on the data and take them into account in the analysis.’

    How to cite this chapter
    Haklay, M. 2016. Why is participation inequality important?. In: Capineri, C et al, European Handbook of Crowdsourced Geographic Information. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bax.c
    License

    This is an Open Access chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license (unless stated otherwise), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Copyright is retained by the author(s).

    Peer Review Information

    This book has been peer reviewed. See our Peer Review Policies for more information.

    Additional Information

    Published on Aug. 25, 2016

    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.5334/bax.c


    comments powered by Disqus